Shag, Shagg, Shagged

shag.jpg If you let iTunes set up cover art for your tracks, you’ve probably discovered by now that your copy of Led Zeppelin’s “BBC Sessions” has ended up with the cover art to Zepp whiteboy-dreadlock cover band Dread Zeppelin, and that George Harrison’s legendary “All Things Must Pass” is sporting cover art for “The Essential George Gershwin.” And so it was that I came across this image in my iTunes collection recently, associated with some tracks by The Shaggs (we’ll come back to them).

Didn’t know who this dastardly-looking assemblage of unsung hair rockers was, but sure as hell knew it wasn’t The Shaggs. But Shag wasn’t hard to find. Shag sounds pretty much like their picture looks – generic hair rock awash in that fakey “pained” sound, like they’re living in a petrified forest of suffering and loss, approximately as convincing as a bowl of silk flowers in a hotel lobby, having just lost the greatest 14-year-old gum-smacking love of their collective lives.

To confuse matters, there’s another band somewhere in the bowels of the iTunes Music Store called Shagg. Like Shag, Shagg is about as far removed from The Shaggs as World Saxophone Quartet are from John Phillip Sousa. Spacemen 3 from The Kingston Trio. Mogwai from Martin Denny. Shagg sound like a sort of Gong meets Jack Johnson meets King Crimson fusion that failed to escape from the dollar bin. Not terrible, not particularly embarrassing, but a bit genteel, and full of empty lyrics like “One day I was walking down the street / It started to rain / Then I met this cute little girl / She even knew my name …” Blah blah blah.

You probably think you know where I’m going with this. If you do, you’re absolutely brilliant and I want to hire you / have your baby / carjack your great aunt Mavis (circle one), since I have absolutely no idea. It would appear to the naive reader that I’m methodically tearing down this pair of accidental discoveries — Shag and Shagg* — to build to the ineluctable conclusion that The Shaggs were some tremendous rock and roll revelation. You wouldn’t be entirely wrong. Except that it would be a real stretch to say that The Shaggs rocked.

*Shag → Shagg → Shaggs – decline the verb, if you’ve got the grapes.

[audio:http://stuckbetweenstations.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/shaggs-sports-car.mp3]
Excerpt from “That Little Sports Car.” Click to play.

Potw Cover Skip backwards 30 years. If Shag is bad for being predictable, The Shaggs were bad because they were totally, unapologetically, sincerely naive. Art brut in the truest sense of the term. They meant what they played and played what they meant. The Shaggs didn’t let the fact that they had only completed a few music lessons stop them from recording their first album. They didn’t let the fact that they seemed completely unexposed to the entire universe of recorded music stop them. They didn’t let trivial things like rhythm or melody stop them. They just wrote from the heart, unimportant details like “grace” be damned. And that’s not really bad. Not in the way that Shag are bad, anyway.

It would be so easy to do the So-Bad-It’s-Good thing with the Shaggs. But this trio of New Hampshire sisters transcended that category (“What the hell do they do in small New Hampshire towns … scramble radio signals?” asked one reviewer). The Shaggs rise to a different occassion. They’re certainly not “good” by any traditional standards. This is probably some of the most wooden, tuneless, a-rythmic music you’ll ever hear. But neither are they bad. Or, at least not bad in the way that Shag is bad.

Lester Bangs said that The Shaggs’ first album, “Philosophy of the World,” was “A landmark in rock and roll history.” The Spin Alternative Record Guide says that Philosophy “behaves as if pop conventions of structure, tonality, rhythm, meter, and harmony never existed.” The New York Times goes all the way: “Philosophy was maybe the best worst rock album ever made.” Their producer/daddy Austin Wiggin, Jr. said at the time, “[The Shaggs] are real, pure, and unaffected by outside influences. Their music is different; it is theirs alone.” But the great jazz composer Carla Bley summed it up best: “They bring my mind to a complete halt.” So true.

The Shaggs’ recorded output is mind-numbingly, bone-jarringly, fantastically bad. But unlike Shag, The Shaggs were totally un-self-conscious. They weren’t trying to climb the heavy metal charts, or “get boys,” or shatter boundaries, or even make great art. They just wrote and sang and played from some place so real that most of us would have no idea how to get there. Even if we tried.

Think of the most embarrassingly sincere Hallmark card you’ve ever received, and crank its saccharine quotient up to ten. Now imagine yourself writing that card with absolutely no awareness that it will be perceived as corny by its recipient. Now you’re starting to walk in The Shaggs’ shoes. It takes a very special kind of mind to get there. A special way of being completely removed from culture and “cool” to pack a moral message into every stanza while playing music so herky-jerky and stilted — and yet so totally gonzo — that most garage bands would be stultified if they so much as tried to reproduce the sound.

Oh, the rich people want what the poor people’s got
And the poor people want what the rich people’s got
And the skinny people want what the fat people’s got
And the fat people want what the skinny people’s got

That’s truth, man. Raw, un-shiny, unprocessed truth. Turbinado sugar. Maple syrup sucked straight outta the trunk with a bamboo straw so it drizzles down your chin and onto your terry Kensington. Shag can’t do that. Shagg can’t do that. But The Shaggs? Oh, baby, The Shaggs can do that. Bring your mind to a complete halt. And in the end, isn’t that what we all really want?

Coda: The iTunes genre associated with my entire Shaggs collection is “Tardcore.” And I honestly don’t remember whether I set that genre myself in a moment of rare lucidity, or whether I downloaded the tracks that way. But I did look it up:

Tardcore
Noun: Someone who seems completely ignorant or idiotic in method, speech, or action, but is surprisingly capable of amazing feats.

Since I already own a couple of Shaggs discs, I probably didn’t download the tracks, but ripped them, which can only mean I set the genre myself without remembering. Which would be understandable if my mind was, indeed, at a complete halt. As it probably was.

Shackerbuggy

While The Shaggs were recording “Philosophy,” I was a 6-year-old boy, assembling a Snap-Tite Banana Splits model in a polyester leisure suit while lounging on a gen-yoo-ine shag rug.

Encountered a glorious iTunes train wreck? Let us know.

About Scot Hacker

Scot Hacker is a web developer, teacher, and blogger living in Northern California. He is the author of Can You Get to That? The Cosmology of P-Funk and Understanding Liberace: Grooving With The Fey Heckler. He works by day as webmaster at the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism and Knight Digital Media Center, and runs Birdhouse Web and Mail Hosting on the side. Hacker is the author of The BeOS Bible and MP3: The Definitive Guide, and posts near-daily on random stuff at Scot Hacker's foobar blog. He's ecstatic that we're sitting on 100 years of recorded music history. How I Got Stuck When was the last time you bought a record because of the cover? 25 years before MP3s, I used to make a weekly pilgrimage to Cheap Thrills in San Luis Obispo with friends, where we'd surf through dusty wooden bins, de-flowering ourselves in a mist of vinyl, grabbing piles of cut-outs about which we knew virtually nothing. Junior Samples, Temple City Kazoo Orchestra, The Buggles, Paul Desmond, Instant Chic, Smithsonian collections, Robert Moog, Dream Syndicate... didn't matter. If the cover was cool, we assumed there was a good chance the music would turn us on. And we were often right. In that humongous wooden warehouse, between around 1977 and 1984, my musical universe bloomed. There were also duds - dumptruck loads of duds. The lesson that a great cover doesn't tell you jack about the music inside was a long time coming (the inverse correlation - that great music was often hidden behind terrible artwork - came much later). But it didn't matter, because cut-outs never cost more than a couple-three bucks, and all the good shit we uncovered made it worthwhile. In high school, I (for the most part) ignored the music going on around me. The jocks and aggies could keep their Rick Springfield and their Jefferson Starship - we were folding papers after school to The Roches and Zappa and Talking Heads and PiL. But inevitably, some of the spirit of that time stuck with me. ELO and McCartney wormed their way (perhaps undeservedly) into my heart. No one escapes high school without an indelible tattoo on their soul describing the music of that time. When I went away to college, the alt/grunge scene was being born, and getting chicks required familiarity with The Pixies and Porno for Pyros. I couldn't quite figure how these bands were supposed to be as interesting as Meat Puppets or Cecil Taylor or Syd Barrett, but I went along for the ride for a while, best I could. But I never quite "got" alt-rock. Never understood why The Pixies were elevated in the public imagination over a thousand bands I thought were so much more inventive / rocking / interesting. What exactly was Frank Black offering the world that Lou Reed had not? In general, I like music carved in bold strokes - extremely rockin', or extremely beautiful, or extremely weird... I like artists that have a unique sound, something I can hang my hat on. I love Mission of Burma and The Slits and The American Anthology of Folk Music and Devendra Banhart and Bowie and Nick Drake and Eric Dolphy and Ali Farka Toure and Marvin Pontiac. If you were to ask me who was the last great rock and roll band, I'd be likely to answer "The Minutemen." I know it's not true, but I'd say it anyway. And yet, in a weird way, I totally believe it. Today while jogging, I listened to a long interpretation by the Unknown Instructors: "Punk Is Whatever We Made It To Be" - half-spoken / half-sung sonic collage of some of D. Boon's best stanzas. Boon's powerful words rained like hammers and I felt like I was back in 1980, careening down the highway in a green VW bug with The Stooges blasting. It was that spirit of amazement that I used to live for - the one I never got from the 90s indie scene. And then, just as quickly, I thought "God, I'm living in the past. I suck." I'm stuck. I have vast collections of LPs, CDs, and MP3s. I listen to music for hours each day, and yet I'm completely out of it, musically speaking. I confess -- I've never listened to Guns-n-Roses or Pearl Jam or Prince, and I've only recently heard "Nevermind" in its entirety. If it weren't for Twitter, I wouldn't even know Lady Gaga existed. I'm oblivious to the stuff that supposedly matters to "music people." It's not like I'm totally unaware of pop music. I just have a finely tuned ability to tune out whatever doesn't interest me. I don't quite know how to explain it. I can only say that my friends register shock when they learn that I've never heard of Elliot Smith. And yet I do not feel thirsty. I'm always open to being turned on. But I learned long ago that, unfortunately, you can't trust beautiful cover art to promise great music, and you can't always trust your friends to push your music buttons. I'm happy to listen to damn near anything. And every now and then, that "anything" will turn into something that will become important to me over time. Something that will last. I like music with staying power. Belle and Sebastien have a certain appeal, but I don't think they're going to occupy even the tiniest slot in my consciousness in 20 years. But the power and inventiveness of the Art Ensemble of Chicago, John Fahey, Robert Wyatt, Can, The Carter Family, The Clash, will never dissipate. I have little interest in the "new" factor. I could not care less whether this year's model is the baddest thing going on in Atlanta or a rare gem rescued from 78 rpm oblivion by Robert Crumb. It's all the same to me. Just squeeze my lemon / 'till the juice runs down my leg. Please. A friend once said that he felt lucky to have been born so late in history, because the later you're born, the more history you have to work with. I don't think I really understood what he was saying until I was about 40. It's not about being born late, it's about this massive archive we're sitting on - the entire history of recorded music under our butts, which we can either choose to ignore or to mine for all it's worth. Every hour I spend checking out the flavor of the month is an hour I haven't spent with David Thomas or Richard Hell or Shuggie Otis. Life's too short. I'm going to use this site to drift back and forth through musical history, modernity be damned. You turn me on, I'm a radio. Let me know what I'm missing. shacker's station at last.fm

3 thoughts on “Shag, Shagg, Shagged

  1. Last.fm takes this a step further, and it confuses any bands with the same name, mixing their play stats into one, and with a wiki entry that may clarify that there is more than one band by this name, but doesn’t disambiguate the bands into separate pages becasue it relies on the band name in song tags to pull the bios.

    The stats part of it makes it pretty confusing to figure out what songs are what. Also this confuses the social networking since listeners to bands by the same name get lumped together.

    It also has a nasty way of confusing songs with the same title by the same artist that appear on different releases.

    So, a copy of the Velvet Underground’s last third album offers a sample of After Hours from the playlist, and suggests the song is in their radio rotations.

    But, instead of the original version, which is to me all about the fragility of Mo Tucker’s gentle voice, I get a hard rockin’ version sung by Lou Reed, apparently from a later live album. And while it’s playing I see the album cover from VU’s third. Very disorienting.

    I’ve seen this a few times, even with it playing remixes instead of the original, such as a reggae version of Pink Floyd’s Fearless that apparently showed up on a later collection, Works. And the shout out page they have for each song doesn’t disambiguate either, so you have no clue which version the comments are raving about.

  2. Wow. Just goes to show that even with our wonderful relational databases and tons of human involvement, systems that seem pretty intelligent on the surface are really just dumb automatons after all, and artificial intelligence is still the impossible holy grail.

  3. The lyrics you highlight are from a tongue-in-cheek song, suckah! But thanks for the nice artist comparisons. One man’s dollar bin is another man’s desert island disc.

    I agree that the iTunes and Last.fm databases leave something to be desired.

Comments are closed.