<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Aviator, Part I: Michael Jackson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stuckbetweenstations.org/2009/06/28/the-aviator-part-i-michael-jackson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stuckbetweenstations.org/2009/06/28/the-aviator-part-i-michael-jackson/</link>
	<description>Music matters as if music mattered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:11:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: shacker</title>
		<link>http://stuckbetweenstations.org/2009/06/28/the-aviator-part-i-michael-jackson/comment-page-1/#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>shacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuckbetweenstations.org/?p=1103#comment-500</guid>
		<description>No doubt there can be a fuzzy line between funk and disco, but MJ didn&#039;t really dip a toe into funk waters, did he? But I think that for some people, that wouldn&#039;t be the right question to ask. Those people are measuring MJ&#039;s significance in terms other than what category bucket his music gets thrown into. I don&#039;t dislike MJ&#039;s music because it&#039;s disco-y, I dislike it because it feels thin. But that&#039;s just me.

I hadn&#039;t seen Thriller until two nights ago so can&#039;t comment on that. 

At the end of the day one can&#039;t convince anyone else that any particular music is good or bad, &quot;worthy&quot; or not. All I can say that&#039;s &quot;true&quot; is that I don&#039;t dig MJ&#039;s sound. Glitter ain&#039;t my thing. I hope I can say that without it being perceived that the music I listen to is more &quot;serious&quot; or &quot;significant&quot; - I love simple from Leadbelly to the Trashmen. You should be able to say you prefer Thompson or Ornette without fear of being branded snooty - that&#039;s not what it&#039;s about. The question is whether MJ&#039;s music feels real and true. It sure doesn&#039;t to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt there can be a fuzzy line between funk and disco, but MJ didn&#8217;t really dip a toe into funk waters, did he? But I think that for some people, that wouldn&#8217;t be the right question to ask. Those people are measuring MJ&#8217;s significance in terms other than what category bucket his music gets thrown into. I don&#8217;t dislike MJ&#8217;s music because it&#8217;s disco-y, I dislike it because it feels thin. But that&#8217;s just me.</p>
<p>I hadn&#8217;t seen Thriller until two nights ago so can&#8217;t comment on that. </p>
<p>At the end of the day one can&#8217;t convince anyone else that any particular music is good or bad, &#8220;worthy&#8221; or not. All I can say that&#8217;s &#8220;true&#8221; is that I don&#8217;t dig MJ&#8217;s sound. Glitter ain&#8217;t my thing. I hope I can say that without it being perceived that the music I listen to is more &#8220;serious&#8221; or &#8220;significant&#8221; &#8211; I love simple from Leadbelly to the Trashmen. You should be able to say you prefer Thompson or Ornette without fear of being branded snooty &#8211; that&#8217;s not what it&#8217;s about. The question is whether MJ&#8217;s music feels real and true. It sure doesn&#8217;t to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://stuckbetweenstations.org/2009/06/28/the-aviator-part-i-michael-jackson/comment-page-1/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuckbetweenstations.org/?p=1103#comment-499</guid>
		<description>Dan and Scot, I get what you&#039;re saying about funk and disco, and I didn&#039;t spend the Eighties moonwalking to MJ. Back then, I might have named Nick Lowe or Elvis Costello as the King of Pop. But here are a few things to think about:

1. The line between funk and disco is sometimes fuzzy.  I remember some musical comrades dismissing George Clinton and Grandmaster Flash as &quot;disco.&quot; The Clash were accused of &quot;selling out to disco&quot; for starting Sandinista with a funk/ rap number, even though it&#039;s the album&#039;s angriest song. Our writers at this site remain divided over whether Prince is funk or disco.

2.  Music lovers haven&#039;t just suddenly admitted love for MJ.  Although I didn&#039;t vote for Thriller in the 1983 Village Voice critics&#039; poll, it won in a landslide, and I do think (stylistic criticisms aside) that its effect on racial and geographic divides was remarkable.

3.  I&#039;d place Off the Wall (and to a lesser extent, Thriller) in the same category as Fleetwood Mac&#039;s Rumours: i.e., not really my style, but an unusually well-made representation of that moment in pop music. Boasting about how I was busy listening to Richard Thompson and Ornette Coleman would have seemed snooty. Instead, I  tried to find context for my ambivalence about MJ&#039;s musical and cultural legacy.

4.  I find the &quot;cheesy pickup scenes&quot; as distasteful as Dan does. But if we avoided all who took part in them, our record collections might be pretty thin.  Dizzy Gillespie once tried to hit on my sister. Robert Christgau recently recalled Hold Steady frontman Craig Finn&#039;s great story about a member of the Descendents who had asked him where he could find a groupie for some action. Finn&#039;s response: &quot;If we knew that, what would we be doing at a Descendents show?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan and Scot, I get what you&#8217;re saying about funk and disco, and I didn&#8217;t spend the Eighties moonwalking to MJ. Back then, I might have named Nick Lowe or Elvis Costello as the King of Pop. But here are a few things to think about:</p>
<p>1. The line between funk and disco is sometimes fuzzy.  I remember some musical comrades dismissing George Clinton and Grandmaster Flash as &#8220;disco.&#8221; The Clash were accused of &#8220;selling out to disco&#8221; for starting Sandinista with a funk/ rap number, even though it&#8217;s the album&#8217;s angriest song. Our writers at this site remain divided over whether Prince is funk or disco.</p>
<p>2.  Music lovers haven&#8217;t just suddenly admitted love for MJ.  Although I didn&#8217;t vote for Thriller in the 1983 Village Voice critics&#8217; poll, it won in a landslide, and I do think (stylistic criticisms aside) that its effect on racial and geographic divides was remarkable.</p>
<p>3.  I&#8217;d place Off the Wall (and to a lesser extent, Thriller) in the same category as Fleetwood Mac&#8217;s Rumours: i.e., not really my style, but an unusually well-made representation of that moment in pop music. Boasting about how I was busy listening to Richard Thompson and Ornette Coleman would have seemed snooty. Instead, I  tried to find context for my ambivalence about MJ&#8217;s musical and cultural legacy.</p>
<p>4.  I find the &#8220;cheesy pickup scenes&#8221; as distasteful as Dan does. But if we avoided all who took part in them, our record collections might be pretty thin.  Dizzy Gillespie once tried to hit on my sister. Robert Christgau recently recalled Hold Steady frontman Craig Finn&#8217;s great story about a member of the Descendents who had asked him where he could find a groupie for some action. Finn&#8217;s response: &#8220;If we knew that, what would we be doing at a Descendents show?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shacker</title>
		<link>http://stuckbetweenstations.org/2009/06/28/the-aviator-part-i-michael-jackson/comment-page-1/#comment-498</link>
		<dc:creator>shacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 23:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuckbetweenstations.org/?p=1103#comment-498</guid>
		<description>If someone had asked me last week whether I know anyone who had ever liked or listened to Michael Jackson, I would have said no. So watching the world react to MJ&#039;s death has been a very strange experience for me. Suddenly it&#039;s as if society is full of closet Michael Jackson fans, just waiting to be awakened. Even the people you thought you knew for decades are turning out to have secretly loved Jackson&#039;s work all along.  

Suddenly I wake up  and discover that all these people who lived through the same 80s as me were neither indifferent to nor actively disliking his music, but actually liking it. I never in a million years would have guessed that about my own friends. Was it some kind of secret passion everyone kept to themselves?  I *assumed* that most people I know/knew felt the same way about 80s disco as I did. As evidenced by the hot water I got into on Facebook recently after calling Jackson&#039;s 80s/90s hits &quot;atrocious,&quot; I could not have been more wrong.

I&#039;ve never understood how MJ&#039;s music earned him the mantle &quot;King of Pop.&quot;  Yes, his childhood music was heartbreakingly sweet and wonderful.  Yes he was an amazing dancer.  And yes, he had an influence on music to come. But no, I don&#039;t see what&#039;s likable about his 80s/90s disco-pop. That&#039;s 100% subjective of course; I just thought most people shared my opinion on this.

That doesn&#039;t mean I don&#039;t love and respect people who like his music. I&#039;m just surprised to learn that they do. Thank god for friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If someone had asked me last week whether I know anyone who had ever liked or listened to Michael Jackson, I would have said no. So watching the world react to MJ&#8217;s death has been a very strange experience for me. Suddenly it&#8217;s as if society is full of closet Michael Jackson fans, just waiting to be awakened. Even the people you thought you knew for decades are turning out to have secretly loved Jackson&#8217;s work all along.  </p>
<p>Suddenly I wake up  and discover that all these people who lived through the same 80s as me were neither indifferent to nor actively disliking his music, but actually liking it. I never in a million years would have guessed that about my own friends. Was it some kind of secret passion everyone kept to themselves?  I *assumed* that most people I know/knew felt the same way about 80s disco as I did. As evidenced by the hot water I got into on Facebook recently after calling Jackson&#8217;s 80s/90s hits &#8220;atrocious,&#8221; I could not have been more wrong.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never understood how MJ&#8217;s music earned him the mantle &#8220;King of Pop.&#8221;  Yes, his childhood music was heartbreakingly sweet and wonderful.  Yes he was an amazing dancer.  And yes, he had an influence on music to come. But no, I don&#8217;t see what&#8217;s likable about his 80s/90s disco-pop. That&#8217;s 100% subjective of course; I just thought most people shared my opinion on this.</p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t mean I don&#8217;t love and respect people who like his music. I&#8217;m just surprised to learn that they do. Thank god for friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Haig</title>
		<link>http://stuckbetweenstations.org/2009/06/28/the-aviator-part-i-michael-jackson/comment-page-1/#comment-497</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Haig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 17:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuckbetweenstations.org/?p=1103#comment-497</guid>
		<description>Disco did suck, if not necessarily for the sonic nature of the stuff. Disco was all about cheezy pickup scenes and the promotion of superficiality in general. Michael Jackson&#039;s stuff was, to me, very much Disco, and I thought it sucked, regardless of his prodigious talents. I don&#039;t care how somebody dances when I buy a record (ok, so nobody buys records anymore, you get the point).

Funk, on the other hand, while sharing a good patch of the same sonic turf as Disco, did not and does not suck. Funk is not all about cheezy pickup scenes, it&#039;s a much deeper thing. The Jackson 5 were funky!

RIP Michael, you bloody great freak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disco did suck, if not necessarily for the sonic nature of the stuff. Disco was all about cheezy pickup scenes and the promotion of superficiality in general. Michael Jackson&#8217;s stuff was, to me, very much Disco, and I thought it sucked, regardless of his prodigious talents. I don&#8217;t care how somebody dances when I buy a record (ok, so nobody buys records anymore, you get the point).</p>
<p>Funk, on the other hand, while sharing a good patch of the same sonic turf as Disco, did not and does not suck. Funk is not all about cheezy pickup scenes, it&#8217;s a much deeper thing. The Jackson 5 were funky!</p>
<p>RIP Michael, you bloody great freak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

