<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shag, Shagg, Shagged</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stuckbetweenstations.org/2007/03/15/shag-shagg-shagged/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stuckbetweenstations.org/2007/03/15/shag-shagg-shagged/</link>
	<description>Music matters as if music mattered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 17:22:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shagg</title>
		<link>http://stuckbetweenstations.org/2007/03/15/shag-shagg-shagged/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Shagg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuckbetweenstations.org/2007/03/15/shag-shagg-shagged/#comment-148</guid>
		<description>The lyrics you highlight are from a tongue-in-cheek song, suckah! But thanks for the nice artist comparisons. One man&#039;s dollar bin is another man&#039;s desert island disc.

I agree that the iTunes and Last.fm databases leave something to be desired.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lyrics you highlight are from a tongue-in-cheek song, suckah! But thanks for the nice artist comparisons. One man&#8217;s dollar bin is another man&#8217;s desert island disc.</p>
<p>I agree that the iTunes and Last.fm databases leave something to be desired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shacker</title>
		<link>http://stuckbetweenstations.org/2007/03/15/shag-shagg-shagged/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>shacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 04:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuckbetweenstations.org/2007/03/15/shag-shagg-shagged/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Wow. Just goes to show  that even with our wonderful relational databases and tons of human involvement, systems that seem pretty intelligent on the surface are really just dumb automatons after all, and artificial intelligence is still the impossible holy grail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Just goes to show  that even with our wonderful relational databases and tons of human involvement, systems that seem pretty intelligent on the surface are really just dumb automatons after all, and artificial intelligence is still the impossible holy grail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mal</title>
		<link>http://stuckbetweenstations.org/2007/03/15/shag-shagg-shagged/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>mal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 00:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuckbetweenstations.org/2007/03/15/shag-shagg-shagged/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Last.fm takes this a step further, and it confuses any bands with the same name, mixing their play stats into one, and with a wiki entry that may clarify that there is more than one band by this name, but doesn&#039;t disambiguate the bands into separate pages becasue it relies on the band name in song tags to pull the bios. 

The stats part of it makes it pretty confusing to figure out what songs are what. Also this confuses the social networking since listeners to bands by the same name get lumped together.

It also has a nasty way of confusing songs with the same title by the same artist that appear on different releases. 

So, a copy of the Velvet Underground&#039;s last third album offers a sample of After Hours from the playlist, and suggests the song is in their radio rotations. 

But, instead of the original version, which is to me all about the fragility of Mo Tucker&#039;s gentle voice, I get a hard rockin&#039; version sung by Lou Reed, apparently from a later live album. And while it&#039;s playing I see the album cover from VU&#039;s third. Very disorienting. 

I&#039;ve seen this a few times, even with it playing remixes instead of the original, such as a reggae version of Pink Floyd&#039;s Fearless that apparently showed up on a later  collection, Works. And the shout out page they have for each song doesn&#039;t disambiguate either, so you have no clue which version the comments are raving about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last.fm takes this a step further, and it confuses any bands with the same name, mixing their play stats into one, and with a wiki entry that may clarify that there is more than one band by this name, but doesn&#8217;t disambiguate the bands into separate pages becasue it relies on the band name in song tags to pull the bios. </p>
<p>The stats part of it makes it pretty confusing to figure out what songs are what. Also this confuses the social networking since listeners to bands by the same name get lumped together.</p>
<p>It also has a nasty way of confusing songs with the same title by the same artist that appear on different releases. </p>
<p>So, a copy of the Velvet Underground&#8217;s last third album offers a sample of After Hours from the playlist, and suggests the song is in their radio rotations. </p>
<p>But, instead of the original version, which is to me all about the fragility of Mo Tucker&#8217;s gentle voice, I get a hard rockin&#8217; version sung by Lou Reed, apparently from a later live album. And while it&#8217;s playing I see the album cover from VU&#8217;s third. Very disorienting. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen this a few times, even with it playing remixes instead of the original, such as a reggae version of Pink Floyd&#8217;s Fearless that apparently showed up on a later  collection, Works. And the shout out page they have for each song doesn&#8217;t disambiguate either, so you have no clue which version the comments are raving about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

